State v. Blevins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
A trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that no discovery violation occurred when the State failed to disclose before trial the reason that a testifying officer was able to identify a defendant's voice on a recording, when the State had disclosed in discovery that the witness recognized the defendant's voice and the trial court instructed the jury to disregard the officer's testimony about how he knew the defendant.
Darren W. Blevins ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment entered following a jury trial and conviction for selling and delivering marijuana and possession…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. McClintickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carmely v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- TOPPIN v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021