Legal Opinion

Smith v. Humane Society of United States

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 25, 2017No. SC 95175PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Breckenridge, chief justice

Mary Ann Smith filed a petition against the Humane Society of the United States (“HSUS”) and Missourians for the Protection of Dogs, alleging various statements made in documents related to the ballot initiative, the “Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act,” were defamatory and placed her in a false light. Specifically, Ms. Smith alleged the specific statements were defamatory because they falsely stated or implied her kennel was one of the worst “puppy mills” in Missouri, according to the research done by HSUS, had “atrocious” and “unconscionable” state and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. R.M.A. (a Minor Child), by his Next Friend: Rachelle Appleberry v. Blue Springs R-IV School District and Blue Springs School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. James Turntine v. Charles PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. Jason Stockley v. Jennifer JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Williams v. Bayer Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Jackson v. BartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API