Legal Opinion
Lee v. Astrue
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 27, 2010No. CV 08-7531 RCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Louise Kam Har Lee filed a complaint on November 14, 2008, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for disability benefits. On April 24, 2009, the Commissioner answered the complaint, and the parties filed a joint stipulation on July 10, 2009.
BACKGROUND
I
On January 31, 2007, plaintiff applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, claiming an inability to work since December 2, 2006, due to Crohn’s disease. 1 Certified Administrative…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barreto-Pagan v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- Daigneau v.KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- Kobak v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Lippucci v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Montgomery v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023