United States v. Seeger
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION
FORAY, Judge:
Upon original review of the record of trial in this case, this Court, by its decision dated 12 April 1976, affirmed the approved findings of guilty and the sentence. Subsequent thereto, appellate defense counsel filed a Motion for Reconsideration based on the ground, raised now for the first time, *250that the evidence introduced at the trial failed to establish the accused’s guilt of the offense of leaving the scene of an accident without making his identity known (Charge IV and its specification). We found the Motion for Reconsideration to be not timely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. PriestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. FleigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. EaglesonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. WaluskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LittletonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. Quinn-MonrealNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006