Legal Opinion
Freundlich v. Town Bd. of Southampton
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the respondents violated the town ordinance by altering lot lines in an approved subdivision without following the mandated procedures. The lot lines on the revised plan under which the lots were to be sold were at variance with those on the first subdivision which was approved by the town planning board. It follows, therefore, that this attempted resubdivision is invalid (see Town of Southampton Rules and Regulations for Subdivision of Land, § 218, § 300…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Voorheesville Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. E. W. Tompkins Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Angiolillo v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Ellington Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Prudco Realty Corp. v. PalermoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Friends of Hammondsport v. Village of Hammondsport Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.