Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
DAWS ON, District Judge.
The sole question involved in this ease is whether the plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the advertising agency business, was entitled to be classified as a personal service corporation under the provisions of section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (Comp. St. § 6336%i). The applicable part of that section reads as follows:
“The term ‘personal service corporation’ means a corporation whose income is to be ascribed primarily to the activities of the principal owners or stockholders who are themselves regularly engaged in the active conduct of the affairs of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Tucker v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Ryan v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- New Orleans City & Lake Railroad v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- State Wholesale Grocers, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiffs v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- KENTUCKY STATE AFL-CIO v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Fuller & Smith v. RoutzahnDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.