Legal Opinion

DeJesus v. Alba

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2010No. 144 SSM 16PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division properly concluded that no triable issues of fact existed whether defendant driver acted prudently under the circumstances.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Green v. HosleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Warley v. GramppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Corina v. Boys & Girls Club of Schenectady, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Ramirez v. MolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API