Legal Opinion

Burke v. Utah National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1896No. 5933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

In 1888 one Hall and one Moore, partners under the name of Hall & Moore, and engaged, or intend*249ing to engage, in the business of purchasing live stock in the then territory of Utah, and shipping the same to market, opened negotiations with the Utah National Bank with a view to transacting business with that institution. At Hall & Moore’s request a letter was written to the South Omaha National Bank inquiring as to the standing of George Burke & Frazier, a firm engaged in the live stock commission business at South Omaha, with which Hall & Moore contemplated transacting their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parliman v. YoungSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1879
  2. Campbell v. NesbittNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graham Ice Cream Co. v. PetrosNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Howells State Bank v. Estate of MullerNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Commercial Investment Corp. v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Huston v. NewgassIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API