Legal Opinion

Stoehrer & Pratt Dodgem Corp. v. Lusse Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 20, 1925No. 3262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The complainant, by its bill in equity, charges that the respondents have infringed Letters Patent No. 1,339,299 issued to John Jacob Stock and Letters Patent No. 1,373,108, No. 1,467,-959 and No. 1,478,979 issued to Harold Stoehrer and Max Stoehrer and acquired from the patentees by' purchase and assignment. The claims in issue are 3 and 4 of the first patent, 1 and 9 of the second, 1 and 2 of the third, and all of the fourth

The respondents challenge the validity of the claims on several grounds, including anticipation and lack of patentable invention, and deny…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Peters v. Active Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Prosperity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API