Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hellwig

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 21, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this proceeding to compel the executrix to account, a preliminary issue is raised as to the status of the petitioner as a creditor of the estate. The petitioner is the former wife of decedent. She has filed a claim based upon a separation agreement executed by her and the decedent on July 15, 1935. The single defense to the claim is that the separation agreement is part of a bargain to procure a divorce and is, therefore, illegal and void.

The surrogate holds that the agreement sued on is in all respects legal and valid and that the petitioner is entitled to enforce it against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ruppert v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Schley v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Dykers v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Ferkin v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 25New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Srogi v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bergen v. BergenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API