Legal Opinion

United States v. Marvin Jerome Horsley, Earl Howard McDonald

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 1989No. 86-3316PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Per curiam

I

In this appeal, Marvin Jerome Horsley and Earl Howard McDonald challenge their convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1982), on two grounds. One of the grounds is frivolous 1 and is not worthy of discussion. The other, based on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), has merit and requires that we remand the case to the district court for further proceedings.

The appellants, who are black, contend that during the selection of the jury that tried the case, the prosecutor purposefully discriminated against them…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Ex Parte BirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. United States v. Nick StavroulakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. United States v. Julio Cesar Vasquez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API