Legal Opinion

Naidu v. Harwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated June 5, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant Steven F. Harwin for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (1) imputes to the owner of a motor vehicle the negligence of one who uses or operates it with the owner’s permission. That section gives rise to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Bruno v. PrivilegiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Headley v. TesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Barrett v. McNultyNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Stewart v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adamson v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Panteleon v. AmayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Cherry v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Padilla v. FelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Cooper v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API