Legal Opinion

Quinlan v. Sugar-Gold

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 2017No. 51,191-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

liThe plaintiffs, Mickey McGuinness Quinlan,.. Mackey Sugar Quinlan and Charles Brian Sugar, appeal the district court’s ruling which granted a special.motion to strike filed by the defendant, Melissa Sugar Gold. The defendant has appealed the district court’s denial of attorney fees and costs. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand with instructions.

FACTS

The parties are the members of the same family. The plaintiff, Charles Sugar, is the biological son of Alan Sugar (“Alan Sugar”);1 the defendant, Melissa Sugar *1178Gold, is Alan’s adopted daughter.2 The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. Kennedy v. Sheriff of East Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  5. Sassone v. ElderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. TylerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Ford v. Caddo ParishDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
  3. Hynes v. Lakefront Management AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  4. Jackelyn Yanong v. Jenny Dawson ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Jackel Int'l Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API