Legal Opinion

Bentley v. West Valley City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2001No. 990564Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

" 1 Plaintiffs, who were cited for speeding, seek reimbursement of fines paid to defendants. After either pleading guilty or being adjudicated guilty, they brought the present "collateral attack." The district court dismissed plaintiffs' claims. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 The five plaintiffs, Adam Bentley, Douglas Cluff, William Rieck, Keith Rose, and Mabel Johnson were issued speeding citations. Each citation stemmed from the use of photo radar in Sandy City or West Valley City, and each plaintiff received a summons and citation in the mail, Each proceeded through the eriminal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. State v. ParsonsUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. James v. GaletkaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. Kelbach v. McCotterUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Estes v. TalbotUtah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API