Legal Opinion
De La Cruz v. Saul
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 16, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01172Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLINE DE LA CRUZ, : Civil No. 1:19-CV-01172 : Plaintiff, : : (Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab) v. : : ANDREW M. SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction. This is a social security action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The plaintiff, Charline De La Cruz (“De La Cruz”), seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits as both a child and an adult under Title XVI of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.