Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perry Bellamy v. William Cogdell, Warden, Brooklyn House of Detention

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 8, 1992No. 17-1813Published

1DissentFeinberg, Circuit Judge

(with whom OAKES, JON 0. NEWMAN, KEARSE, CARDAMONE and WINTER, Circuit Judges, join), dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. This case should never have been subjected to an in banc hearing. And now that it has been, the majority has reached a result that is inconsistent with our precedents.

Misuse of the in banc procedure

Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that:(a) When Hearing or Rehearing in Banc Will be Ordered. A majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service may order that an appeal or other proceeding be heard or reheard by the court of appeals…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Peter CancillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API