Legal Opinion

United Equitable Insurance v. Padgett

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 24, 1969No. 32PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrott, J.

In these two nonjury circuit court actions, consolidated for trial, plaintiff brought separate suits seeking recovery of hospital benefits on separate contracts of insurance issued to the plaintiff by the respective defendants. From judgments in favor of the insured, each of the defendant insurance companies has appealed.

*628Each of the policies contain provisions affording the insured hospitalization benefits. The United Equitable policy provides payment “when such injury shall continually confine the insured to a hospital.” Similar language in the National Central Life policy says “necessarily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stubblefield v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  2. Bockman v. Mutual Health Benefit & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Allen v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AMERICAN FAM. LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF COLUMBUSDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  2. Boykin v. Physicians Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API