Warren v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
The appellant was indicted as an accomplice to forgery, convicted and his penalty fixed at three years in the penitentiary.
The indictment charges that on or about December 10, 1910, one Dona Saulter forged her father, D. T. Hurley’s, name to a check on the Hamilton Bank and Trust Company for twenty-three dollars, and in proper language further that before this forgery, appellant advised, commanded -and encouraged her to commit the forgery, he not being personally present when the forgery was committed.
The State introduced the forger, Dona Saulter, who testified fully, and,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MelvaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Forward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Villarreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.