Legal Opinion

Gilmore Portland Cement Corp. v. Leinard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

This is an action to reform and foreclose a mortgage. The trial court found for defendants and plaintiff appealed.

At the trial no evidence appears to have been offered on the question of reformation of the mortgage and we shall not discuss that question.

The facts are substantially as follows: The defendants, M. C. Leinard and Mary M. Leinard are husband and wife and defendant Pruitt is their son-in-law. The Leinards executed a promissory note for $4000 payable to J. J. Pruitt but not to his order so the note was not a negotiable instrument. This note was secured by a mort gage on certain land…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. Wanamaker & BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Century Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Sublette v. BrewingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Reynolds v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Northwest Thresher Co. v. Eddyville State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API