Galloway v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of child molestation. He now contends the trial court erred by failing to charge the jury on circumstantial evidence, by refusing a request for a presentence investigation, failing to consider probation and not allowing appellant an opportunity to offer evidence in mitigation of punishment. Appellant also contends he did not receive effective assistance of counsel.
1. At trial direct evidence was presented by the victim in this case that appellant molested him. “A charge on circumstantial evidence is required only when the case is wholly dependent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Pitts v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- House v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Sumners v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- McKeown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Yarborough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Lockwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003