Hallman v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
In the court below the accused was adjudged guilty of assault and battery on an indictment which charged the offense of assault with intent to murder.
We must reverse the judgment, and therefore we will not enter into a discussion nor an analysis of the evidence.
The appellant shot Jim Bigham with a pistol and inflicted a severe wound. The justification of the assault centered around the doctrine of self defense, which the defendant claimed. On this factual issue the evidence is in irreconcilable conflict.
The pistol was allowed to be introduced over objections. The appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ragland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981