Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Taylor

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. On exception to master’s report. For opinion on the cross-bill for redemption, see 23 Fed. Rep. 849. Hubbard & Clark and Abbott Bros., for complainant.

1Per curiam

Upon the rendition of the interlocutory decree in this cause the same was sent to the master for the .purpose of ascertaining what number of the bonds described in the mortgage known as the “Income and Equipment Mortgage” were held by parties entitled to prove up the same as valid claims under said mortgage, and also of ascertaining and stating the amount necessary to be paid in order to redeem the property from the lien of the first deeds of trust thereon, represented by Frederick Taylor, trustee. The master has returned an exhaustive report upon these matters, and counsel for the parties in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Stewart v. LansingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Smith v. Sac CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Parsons v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Hollingsworth v. SwickardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Iowa Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1897
  2. Manitowoc Malting Co. v. Milwaukee Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API