Legal Opinion

Coastal Banc SSB v. Helle

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1999No. 98-0175PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals dismissed Coastal Bancs appeal for want of jurisdiction, holding that Coastal failed to timely file its cash deposit in lieu of bond within the time provided in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 45(e). 1 989 S.W.2d 1. Coastal challenges that holding, claiming that the appeal was properly perfected because uncontroverted evidence demonstrates that the certificate of cash deposit was timely filed. We agree and reverse the court of appeals judgment and remand the case to that court for consideration of the remaining issues.

The underlying suit concerns a dispute over the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Davies v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Coastal Bank SSB v. HelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stansberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Coastal Banc SSB v. Helle, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Cottonwood Valley Home Owners Association v. Samuel W. Hudson, III, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002
  4. Stansberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Coastal Banc SSB v. G. T. Helle, Jr. and Wife, Lisa Helle, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API