Legal Opinion

Kunze v. Jones

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 172Published

Appeal from Wayne; Hally, J.- Bill by Arthur E. Kunze against Mary E. Jones to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appeal from decree dismissing bill of complaint. The plaintiff filed his bill of complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien which he had filed against the lands and building of defendants. By the contract, which was made in writing on October 3, 1913, between plaintiff, as contractor, and F. P. Jones and Mary E. Jones, his wife, as owners, plaintiff was to do, to the satisfaction, of the defendants’ architect, acting as the agent of the defendants, all the labor and furnish the material for the concrete work, brick work, iron work, and furnish the material and construct tile drains and inside…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schliess v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Halpin v. GarmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gier v. DaiberMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API