Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1930No. 13730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant made a second motion for continuance which was properly overruled. Diligence for the absent witness was not shown. Appellant had another witness present who gave in substance the same testimony as that set up in the application. Subsequent continuances will not be granted for cumulative testimony. Harvey v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep. 559; Bearden v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep. 276; Sec. 322, Branch’s Annotated P. C., and authorities cited.

That Jones, the alleged purchaser, paid for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Starbeck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Field v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Smart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Woodley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API