Wilson v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentBurch, J.
With regret I realize that I -cannot concur in the majority opinion. Of course, the able author of the court’s opinion cannot be criticized for having made an earnest effort to justify a conclusion which, in my opinion, is incorrect. Although I have sincere respect therefor, I am unable to follow the legal logic in the opinion. As I read the record in this case, the First National Bank in Wichita, in its capacity as trustee, was not named as a party defendant even though an abstract of title would have disclosed that it had acted in such capacity in executing oil and gas leases on its trustee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Withers v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. EssexSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Phillips v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Sonnenberg v. SteinbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897