Legal Opinion

McCombs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 11, 1991No. A91A0175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Plaintiff-insured McCombs appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in this suit to recover additional no-fault medical payment benefits for injuries McCombs sustained in an automobile collision.

At the time of the collision, McCombs was the named insured under four separate State Farm policies, each covering a different vehicle and one of which specifically covered the car involved in the collision. Each policy provided $25,000 in personal injury protection (PIP) coverage and $5,000 in medical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Vogtle v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Cohen-Walker, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Wilson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Mabry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Anderson v. MullinaxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Horace Mann Insurance v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API