Legal Opinion

Kirkham v. Hickerson Bros. Truck Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 13, 1967No. 21153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

George D. Kirkham, plaintiff in error, brought an action against Hickerson Brothers Truck Company, defendant in error, for damages for injuries allegedly sustained because of the negligence of two of the agents of Hickerson Brothers Truck Company. Imperial casualty and Indemnity Company was the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for Kirkham’s employer, and its claim was based on the subrogation provisions of C.R.S. 1953, 81-13-8, as amended. (Now C.R.S. 1963, 81-13-8.) The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, or by name.

At about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardy v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Brown v. TourtelotteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dubus v. Dresser IndustriesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kirkham v. Hickerson Bros. Truck Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Glenn v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Martinez v. WR Grace & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Carlson v. HouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API