Legal Opinion

O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2004No. 02-2323PublishedCited by 235 opinions

1Per curiam

I

This matter is before the en banc court to review issues emanating from the panel opinion in O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. Ashcroft, 342 F.3d 1170 (10th Cir.2003). The panel affirmed a preliminary injunction, granted under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), which enjoined the United States from relying on the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) and the United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances (“Convention”) to prohibit the sac*975ramental use of hoasca by Uniao do Vege-tal and its members (collectively “UDV”). This court granted rehearing to review the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by235 opinions

  1. Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. N. Am. Soccer League, LLC v. U.S. Soccer Fed'n, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API