Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon

Defendant Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon petitions for reconsideration of our decision in Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co., 202 Or App 79, 120 P3d 1260 (2005), on two grounds. First, defendant contends that we erroneously treated prejudgment interest of $589,000 as “economic damages” and as “compensatory damages” in engaging in the due process “ratio” assessment prescribed in State Farm Mut. Ins. v. Campbell, 538 US 408, 123 S Ct 1513, 155 L Ed 2d 585 (2003), and its antecedents. See Goddard, 202 Or App at 110-11, 118-22. Second, defendant contends that we erred in our disposition of…