Urban v. Dollar Bank
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, J.:
¶ 1 ' Appellant Lynn Urban appeals from the June 4, 1997 order granting summary judgment to defendant Dollar Bank (“Bank”) on the ‘ ground that appellant’s claims are subject to the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 1 et seq. (the “Act”). In this unusual case of first impression, we find that appellant’s claims for defamation and malicious abuse of process are not subject to the exclusivity provisions of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse.
¶2 The facts of the case, taken in the light most favorable to appellant as the non-moving party, are as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gorman v. BailDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Keener v. Rapho Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Freeman, E. v. Inter-Media Marketing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Tooey v. AK Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013