Livingston v. State

Judge Bricken, in Gilbert v. State, 30 Ala. App. 214,3 So.2d 95, wrote:

"The conviction of this appellant, defendant in the lower court, of the offense of grand larceny, upon the evidence disclosed by this record, was wrong and unjust, and to let such conviction stand would, in the opinion of this court, be unconscionable. The meagre and unsatisfactory testimony upon which said conviction was rested is insufficient even to create a scintilla of evidence against the accused, and as has been definitely decided the scintilla rule may not be applied in a criminal case, * * *"

Also therein mere…