Legal Opinion

Woodfolk v. Blount

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1816PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The bill charges that a certain Nathaniel Williams was entitled to 256 acres of land, as an officer in the Continental Line ; that on the 16th of May, 1785, he sold the same to a certain Grafton Ireland for a valuable consideration, and executed *120a transfer directing the grant to issue in the name of said Ireland ; that on the 7th of March, 1786, a grant issued to said Williams, the transfer not having been filed in time to enable Ireland to obtain a grant in his own name; that after the issuance of said grant, which includes the lands now in dispute lying on Cumberland River in Smith County,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bradford v. City of ClarksvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. John D. Hux, Receiver of the Federal Grain Company, Inc. v. Sydney J. Butler (Mrs. L. v. Butler)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Glover v. Hardeman CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Williams v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API