Legal Opinion

Lauro v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff obtained a money judgment against defendant Alfred S. Petty in a civil action and sought to recover the amount of the judgment by issuing an execution upon James and Susan Nobles, the mortgagors of real property sold to them by Petty and his wife. The execution was on the monthly payments made to Petty and his wife, who held the mortgage as joint tenants. In compliance with the execution, the Nobles thereafter made their mortgage payments to the Sheriff. When the 90-day period for the execution expired, plaintiff moved to extend…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Secrist v. SecristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Secrist v. SecristNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Ratkovttch v. RatkovitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sweeney, Cohn, Stahl & Vaccaro v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API