Legal Opinion

Hill v. Interstate Transit Lines

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1939No. 30552PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This case is an action for damages for personal injuries arising as a result of a collision between an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding and a passenger bus owned and operated by the defendant company. There was a verdict for the plaintiff in a substantial amount. The defendant appeals. The seriousness of the plaintiff’s injuries is not questioned; neither is the amount of the verdict attacked as excessive.

Defendant in this appeal claims that the verdict is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to it; that the court erred in the refusal to admit certain testimony; and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dodds v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Suhr v. LindellNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. World Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. WorthingNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haight v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Haight v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ross v. CarrollNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hief v. Roberts Dairy Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Webb v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API