Legal Opinion
Lancaster v. Spartanburg County Building Codes Department
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 25, 2005No. C.A. 05-0595HMHWMCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge William M. Ca-toe, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02. 1 Samuel T.D. Lancaster (“Lancaster”) brought a pro se action on February 24, 2005. Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe recommends dismissing Lancaster’s complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Lancaster filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. After a thorough review of the record and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. DayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Singletary v. Aiken County Code Enforcement DivisionDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025