Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Goldstein

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1901No. 3,417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; J. M. Smith, Judge. Action by Julius Goldstein against Charles H. Barn-hart, on promissory notes. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

— The appellee in this cause was the plaintiff below, and filed his complaint in' the circuit court of Jay county against the appellant, who was defendant below. In his complaint, which was in two paragraphs, he sought to enforce the payment of two promissory notes. Appellant answered in three paragraphs. To each paragraph of answer the lower court sustained a demurrer. The appellant asked and was granted leave to amend his answer. He filed an amended answer .in three paragraphs, to the second and third paragraphs of which the appellee interposed a demurrer, which was sustained to both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Hanauer v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. The Saratoga County Bank v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  5. Winchester Electric Light Co. v. VealIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Construction Co. v. Hamilton National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Hatton v. CaseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API