Legal Opinion
United States v. All Funds on Deposit with O'Brien & Associates
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 25, 2012No. Case Nos. 11 C 4175, 12 C 1346PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1041 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge.
The United States filed an in rem action (Case No. 11 C 4175) seeking forfeiture of approximately $6,600,000 held in futures trading accounts. It contends that the money is the property of an affiliate of the Al Qaeda terrorist organization. A number of insurance companies that paid property damage claims arising from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks filed claims to the funds and answers to the government’s complaint. In addition, a group of individuals asserting personal injury and wrongful death claims arising from the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Federal Aviation Administration v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit With R.J. O'Brien & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit With R.J. O'brien & AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit With R.J. O'Brien & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit With R.J. O'Brien & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.