Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Lederson v. Cassidy & Dorfman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 1921Published

Appeal by the defendants, Cassidy & Dorfman and another, from a decision and award of the State Industrial Commission, made on the 25th day of February, 1920, and also from a decision and award of said Commission made on the 11th day of June, 1920.

1Dissent

Kiley, J. (dissenting) :

It must be that some evidence in this record was overlooked. The employer’s report of injury contains the following: “Did accident happen on the premises? Yes. Away from the plant of employer? No. Full name of injured employee: Max Lederson. * * * Occupation when injured? Operator. Was injured employee doing his regular work? Just started. How long was injured person in your employment? Just started. Piece or time worker? Week. Working hours per day? Nine.” The injured employee in his claim for compensation says he was a time *615worker with wages at fifty dollars per…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Brassard v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API