State v. Bassine
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Bassine, 188 Or App 228, 71 P3d 72 (2003), contending that we committed errors of law and fact. We grant reconsideration and adhere to our previous opinion as modified.
Defendant first argues that we committed a factual error by stating that “S was removed from defendant’s home in February 1998, after the other foster child told the police what she had seen and what S had disclosed to her.” Id. at 230. Defendant argues that S was not removed from defendant’s home because of anything that was disclosed by the other foster child…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BassineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Bassine v. HillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- Miles v. City of FlorenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003