Legal Opinion

Young v. W. S. Badcock Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1996No. A96A0541PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs Chip and Kim Young entered into a dealership agreement with defendant W. S. Badcock Corporation to operate a home furnishing center. Subsequently, they sought to terminate this relationship in accordance with the agreement. Upon return of the dealership to defendant, defendant informed plaintiffs that they were entitled to accounts receivable in the amount of $33,413.92 for merchandise they had sold on consignment from defendant. Thereafter, plaintiffs filed a tort claim against defendant alleging that it had fraudulently misrepresented and withheld the actual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wardell v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Unified Services, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Maryland Casualty Insurance v. GlomskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. BufordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Fairfield Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Nebo Ventures, LLC v. Novapro Risk Solutions, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Northwest Plaza, LLC v. Northeast Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Spears v. MacK & Bernstein, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Sunbelt Veterinary Supply, Inc. v. International Business Systems United States, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API