Legal Opinion

York Mfg. Co. v. Colley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1914No. 5363PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

Appellant sued appellees, Y. B. Colley and J. E: Billingsley, for a balance due upon a certain written contract and to foreclose a lien upon certain ice manufacturing machinery. The defense was made that appellant was a foreign corporation organized for pecuniary profit; that it maintained an office and was doing business in Texas, and had not obtained a permit therefor, and for such reasons was not authorized' to maintain a suit on said contract in any of the courts of the state. By supplemental petition appellant admitted that it was a foreign corporation without a permit to do business in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Baltic Mining Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Dozier v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Power Specialty Co. v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Palm Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. BjornstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Sloan v. Miami Margarine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Elliott Electric Co. v. ClevengerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API