Edge v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge.
The indictment contained three counts. The first charged possession of mash for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, the second, the manufacture of such liquor, the third, possession of a still, equipment, supplies, etc., for the purpose of manufacture. The first count only was submitted. Defendant was convicted, his punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.
•The verdict was general. The first count only being submitted the verdict will be referred to that count. Parks v. State, 29 Tex. Cr. App. 597; 16 S. W. 532; Copello v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Burciago v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Horak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Copello v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Celeste v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Wear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926