Legal Opinion

Edge v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1925No. 9062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

The indictment contained three counts. The first charged possession of mash for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, the second, the manufacture of such liquor, the third, possession of a still, equipment, supplies, etc., for the purpose of manufacture. The first count only was submitted. Defendant was convicted, his punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

•The verdict was general. The first count only being submitted the verdict will be referred to that count. Parks v. State, 29 Tex. Cr. App. 597; 16 S. W. 532; Copello v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Burciago v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Horak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Copello v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Celeste v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Wear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API