Morrow v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Judge.
The appellant was informed against and found guilty of uttering a forged instrument, and unlawfully breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony, to wit: grand larceny and petit larceny. Upon this appeal, the appellant urges the insufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions.
We find the evidence sufficient to support the charge of uttering a forged instrument and, therefore, this conviction and sentence is affirmed. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Di Bona v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Escobar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968