Legal Opinion

Morrow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1966No. Nos. 65-720, 65-765PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

The appellant was informed against and found guilty of uttering a forged instrument, and unlawfully breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony, to wit: grand larceny and petit larceny. Upon this appeal, the appellant urges the insufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions.

We find the evidence sufficient to support the charge of uttering a forged instrument and, therefore, this conviction and sentence is affirmed. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Di Bona v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Escobar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API