Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cofer
Supreme Court of Virginia
. Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Norfolk, in an action of unlawful detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtSaunders, J.
This was an action of unlawful detainer brought by J. H. Cofer (defendant in error) to recover possession of certain premises on Granby street, Norfolk, Virginia, alleged to be unlawfully detained by The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (plaintiif in error). The jury trying the case, after hearing the evidence and being instructed as to the law, returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiif, which the court refused to set aside. The case is brought before us by a writ of error to the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiif in error, The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. Kibler's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Toupin v. PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Arbuckle Bros. v. Gates & BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Leominster Gas Light Co. v. HilleryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Fischer v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoffman v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Smith v. PayneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- 11401 Corp. v. Moses & AssociatesChesterfield County Circuit Court · 1988
- Cleve Marsh Hunt Club v. DavisCaroline County Circuit Court · 1990
- Washington v. PrasadSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.