MacFarlane v. Allan-Pfeiffer Chemical Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered September 18, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
In January, 1906, respondent was employed by appellant as a traveling salesman, at a wage of $125 per month and expenses. He was discharged July 2 following, and in January, 1909, he brought this action to recover $208.40, claimed to be due on account of unpaid wages. The answer admitted the employment, but denied the service for the full period of six months; alleged about fifty-five days’ lost time in the months of April, May, and June, and an overpayment of $16.40. The court below found in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
There can be no question but that respondent performed no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wolfe v. . HowesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Clark v. . GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Ryan v. DaytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Hunter v. WaldronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Parker v. MacOmberSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Huffman v. RicketsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Fischhoff v. Adels-Loeb, Inc.New York City Court · 1947
- Frye v. C. E. Blackwell & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921