Legal Opinion

Rohrer v. Milk Control Board

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1935No. Appeal, 239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The Pennsylvania Milk Control Board, undertaking to act by authority of the “Milk Control Board Law” (Act of January 2,1934, P. L. 174,1933-34; 31 PS 684), fixed minimum prices to be paid for milk in this Commonwealth by dealers to producers, by dealers to other dealers, and by consumers to dealers and stores, and issued a general order establishing such minimum prices. Later the board, after hearing and by virtue of the provisions of the act, found that Wayne L. Rohrer, trading as Rohrer’s Med-0 Farms Dairy, had wilfully violated official general orders of the board by…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Rohrer v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Miami Home Milk Producers Asso. v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Kellerman v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Mississippi Milk Commission v. VanceMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API