Legal Opinion

Fiengo v. E. Vitale, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 8, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvert, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining a finding and award of the compensation commissioner denying the plaintiff’s claim for compensation. The plaintiff was employed as a sewing machine operator in the defendant’s garment factory in New Haven. On April 28, 1938, the claimant became ill. A wound upon her right leg had become infected and inflamed causing high temperature and disability. The physicians pronounced her condition cellulitis. The plaintiff claimed her disability had its origin in an injury which she had received on April 11,1938, in the defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Leszczymski v. Andrew Radel Oyster Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Wheat v. Red Star Express LinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Taylor v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Mund v. Farmers' Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Hughes v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API