Legal Opinion

William M. Nicastro v. Janet Reno

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 31, 1996No. 95-5152PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE

2Per curiam

The question presented here is whether federal prisoners who work for Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI) are “employees” entitled to receive the minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. We hold that they are not.

William M. Nicastro and Roy D. Little, federal prison inmates, applied for and were placed in industrial assignments with FPI in the United States Penitentiary at White Deer, Pennsylvania. They brought this claim under the FLSA against the Executive Directors of Federal…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donald Gene Henthorn v. Department of NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Sprouse v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. RI Council 94, Afscme, Afl-Cio v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. Jay R. Bennett and James W. Knipfer v. Matthew J. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Walton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Douglas COUPAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR), RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API