Legal Opinion

Sueta v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Jean Sueta (Claimant) petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to dismiss Claimant’s utilization review petition for lack of jurisdiction due to the provider’s failure to timely supply medical records to the Utilization Review Organization (URO).

Section 306(f.l)(6) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 permits an employer to seek utilization review (UR) to determine if the medical treatment provided to a claimant is reasonable and necessary by having that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vereb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Gazzola v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Hall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API